Housing, single-family, construction general contractors · California

Santa Cruz Green Builders

Santa Cruz, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Santa Cruz Green Builders runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Housing, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Santa Cruz Green Builders: 3.9 TCR = 103% of Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Santa Cruz Green Builders safety composite

Santa Cruz Green Builders scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2018→2024

Santa Cruz Green Builders injury rate improved

Santa Cruz Green Builders's TCR fell 4.3 from 8.1 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.1 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Santa Cruz, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #80/178
  • PHOTO 3738_7300
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3738_7300 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Santa Cruz Green Builders in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Santa Cruz Green Builders averages 3.9 TCR (103% of the Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Santa Cruz Green Builders TCR series: 2018=8.1 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Santa Cruz Green Builders falls in its industry

976 Housing, single-family, constr establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 178 Housing, single-family, constr employers in California.

Santa Cruz Green Builders (32 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Santa Cruz Green Builders
Santa Cruz Green Builders (32 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Santa Cruz Green Builders has fewer employees than the Housing, single-family, construction gen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2018 8.1 8.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CA · Santa Cruz

976 Housing, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 133 employers in Santa Cruz, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3738_7300 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodmeister Master Builders 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Energy Works 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JP Custom Exteriors & Floors 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Santa Cruz 8,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030253 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dignity Health Dominican Hospital 1,652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030253-253001 DOMINICAN HOSPITAL SANTA CRUZ 1,464 FTE
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of New Market 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Formflex 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR OPTO International, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Box Beef - San Antonio 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Architectural Sales of Minnesota, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cole Ford Lincoln 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlie's Country Corner 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avera McKennan Avera St. Luke's Hospital 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.