Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Texas

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices

San Antonio, TX · ~112 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices: 7.4 TCR = 165% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices safety composite

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2018

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices injury rate improved

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices's TCR fell 1.7 from 8.0 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.0 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 165% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #87/146
  • PHOTO STL STL
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: STL STL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices averages 7.4 TCR (165% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=8 · 2018=6.3 · BLS 4.5

Where SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 146 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Texas.

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices (112 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices
SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices (112 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

SAT - Airport United Airlines Offices has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.3 3.6 6 1 0
2017 8.0 8.0 9 0 0
2016 8.0 7.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · TX · San Antonio

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR STL STL 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-BHM-BIRMINGHAM-BHM-TRML 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-RDM-REDMOND-RDM-TRML 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730034-CS 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bison Drilling & Field Services, LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance TX 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Power Funds 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cattlemen 1 Solar 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Hope House Foundation 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lumberton Center (Nclum) 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Delton (Wilak) 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Residential - 55 VanDyke Ave. 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 9 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunland Fire Protection, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cruiser RV Plant 202 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Dealer Sales 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.