Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Georgia

Savannah Container

Savannah, GA · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Savannah Container runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Savannah Container: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Savannah Container safety composite

Savannah Container scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2022

Savannah Container injury rate improved

Savannah Container's TCR fell 4.7 from 6.4 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=5.4 · 2019=4.4 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #45/63
  • PHOTO PRATT (QUALITY CARTO…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PRATT (QUALITY CARTON), LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Savannah Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Savannah Container averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Savannah Container TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=5.4 · 2019=4.4 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Savannah Container falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 63 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Georgia.

Savannah Container (95 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Savannah Container
Savannah Container (95 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Savannah Container has fewer employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 5 0 0
2017 5.4 4.5 6 0 0
2016 6.4 5.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · GA · Savannah

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PRATT (QUALITY CARTON), LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company-Pelahatchie 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signode Industrial Group Danville 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Pad Products 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habersham Electric Membership Corporation 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hart EMC, Hartwell Office 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMMEC Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graves Electrical Services 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR EMS - Fort Wayne, IN 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Louis North 38350 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cmm Belgrade 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon Automotive 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE RPC Freeze Dry 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden Place of Beaumont 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus East 38410 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4186 Cedar Rapids Box Plant 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.