Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard · California

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood

Inglewood, CA · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood safety composite

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2020

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood injury rate improved

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Inglewood, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/20
  • PHOTO MM Packaging PR - Gu…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MM Packaging PR - Guaynabo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scapa Healthcare Inglewood averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Scapa Healthcare Inglewood falls in its industry

236 Die-cut paper products (except establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 20 Die-cut paper products (except employers in California.

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood (59 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Scapa Healthcare Inglewood
Scapa Healthcare Inglewood (59 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Scapa Healthcare Inglewood has fewer employees than the Die-cut paper products (except for offic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 1.3 1 1 0
2018 4.6 4.6 4 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · CA · Inglewood

236 Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 89 employers in Inglewood, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MM Packaging PR - Guaynabo 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockline Industries-Booneville 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Industry - - Tubes & Cores - C342 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Printing Inc 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centinela Hospital Medical Center 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Gate America West LAX 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flying Food Group, LLC. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0769 - INGLEWOOD CA WHSE 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Berry Plastics Bloomington 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Luther St. Cloud Honda 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hv-Open 12/6/10 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Neal Manufacturing Services dba Iowa Laser Technology 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ctec Ag 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insteel Wire Products - Gallatin, TN 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMF Company 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thrift Books Global, LLC (Seattle, WA) 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.