Building cleaning services, janitorial · Ohio

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service

Cincinnati, OH · ~229 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service: 1.3 TCR = 30% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service safety composite

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service held a steady TCR band

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #34/136
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT LIONS GATE…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT LIONS GATE HOUSEKEEPING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service averages 1.3 TCR (30% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 136 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Ohio.

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service (229 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service
Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service (229 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Scarlet & Gray Cleaning Service has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2021 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 2 1 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · OH · Cincinnati

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LIONS GATE HOUSEKEEPING 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Medical Center - Springdale - EVS 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christus St. Michael Hospital - EVS 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR QSI Beaver Dam 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aromair Fine Fragrance 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Akron Brass 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeman-Batavia 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sur-Seal - Main 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Market Basket #56 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Radec Electric Corporation 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Daico Industries, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sierra-at-Tahoe 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Archbold Medical Center 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wentzville 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluid Connectors : McCook 229 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.