Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Nebraska

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC

Lincoln, NE · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC: 1.3 TCR = 35% of Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC safety composite

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2023

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC injury rate improved

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=4.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Lincoln, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Rockport Family Medi…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rockport Family Medicine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC averages 1.3 TCR (35% of the Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=4.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC falls in its industry

2,836 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., employers in Nebraska.

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC (50 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC
Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC (50 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Women's Clinic of Lincoln PC has fewer employees than the Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 0 2 0
2016 3.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NE · Lincoln

2,836 Gynecologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 496 employers in Lincoln, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rockport Family Medicine 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village Family Physicians 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30287) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augusta Back - Neurosurgery 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ ADM Columbus 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Office 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Protein 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAAPA Ethanol Ravenna, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet Servicing LLC 2,850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet - Lincoln HQ 2,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bryan East Campus 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR FACTS Education Corporation 1,986 FTE
NAT-TCR Pcc Airfoils - Crooksville 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1157 Design Concepts LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #56 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Simply Southern Holdings, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheeling Svc Bldg 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus SE Svc Ctr 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-Matic Spring Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bronze Star Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.