Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Scenic Hills Alternative Care

Oakdale, MN · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scenic Hills Alternative Care runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Scenic Hills Alternative Care: 10.7 TCR = 282% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scenic Hills Alternative Care safety composite

Scenic Hills Alternative Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2017→2024

Scenic Hills Alternative Care injury rate improved

Scenic Hills Alternative Care's TCR fell 12.0 from 12.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.0 · 2018=11.7 · 2022=15.9 · 2023=14.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Oakdale, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 282% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #183/240
  • PHOTO RSS/CARTERSVILLE OPE…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RSS/CARTERSVILLE OPERATIONS LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Scenic Hills Alternative Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scenic Hills Alternative Care averages 10.7 TCR (282% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scenic Hills Alternative Care TCR series: 2017=12 · 2018=11.7 · 2022=15.9 · 2023=14 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Scenic Hills Alternative Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #183 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Scenic Hills Alternative Care (57 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Scenic Hills Alternative Care
Scenic Hills Alternative Care (57 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Scenic Hills Alternative Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.0 2.0 7 0 0
2022 15.9 7.9 6 2 0
2018 11.7 0.0 6 0 0
2017 12.0 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Oakdale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Oakdale, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RSS/CARTERSVILLE OPERATIONS LLC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Fort Wayne 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacifica Senior Living Bakersfield 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Ridge Assisted Living 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakdale - Main Store 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11762 Oakdale 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOAK - Oakdale Manufacturing 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Propak - St. Louis, MO 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Holloway Masonry, LLC 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Avalon Springs 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Creek Terrace 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden Gate 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Billco Manufacturing, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watertown, SD 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle - Gary,IN 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.