Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Missouri

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures

Scott City, MO · ~202 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures safety composite

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures: 3.3 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.45× in 2024

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures's TCR rose 1.4 from 3.3 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Scott City, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #10/19
  • PHOTO Anco Engineering Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~202 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anco Engineering Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 19 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Missouri.

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures (202 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures
Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures (202 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Schaefer's Electrical Enclosures has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 2.1 9 0 0
2023 4.2 2.1 8 2 0
2022 3.5 1.5 7 0 0
2021 7.2 3.1 16 0 0
2020 3.1 2.6 6 0 0
2019 6.2 4.4 14 0 0
2018 5.2 2.6 12 0 0
2017 4.8 1.4 10 0 0
2016 3.3 2.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · MO · Scott City

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 19 employers in Scott City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anco Engineering Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENERSYS INC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Urgent Design and Manufacturing 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSM NORTH 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0422 LOWE S OF SPRINGFIELD MO. 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytown - Main Store 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE 361-St Louis North 202 FTE
STATE-SIZE 343008-St. Louis | MO | 343008 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Havco Wood Products, LLC 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buchheit Logistics 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Semo Milling LLC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOCAP - CAPE GIRARDEAU 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Texas Chiller Systems 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Winslow House Care Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BROCKTON-MA60 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Estates at Chateau 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE GGI Secaucus 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wablh - Bellingham Center 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wakwk - Kennewick Office 202 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 202 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.