Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Schaller Corporation Plant 6

Chesterfield, MI · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Schaller Corporation Plant 6: 4.7 TCR = 88% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 safety composite

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2018→2024

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 injury rate improved

Schaller Corporation Plant 6's TCR fell 5.3 from 8.5 in 2018 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.5 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Chesterfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 88% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #78/165
  • PHOTO Batesville Tool & Di…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Batesville Tool & Die Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schaller Corporation Plant 6 averages 4.7 TCR (88% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 TCR series: 2018=8.5 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 5.4

Where Schaller Corporation Plant 6 falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 (59 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Schaller Corporation Plant 6
Schaller Corporation Plant 6 (59 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Schaller Corporation Plant 6 has fewer employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2023 4.5 1.5 2 1 0
2022 6.6 4.0 3 2 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2019 4.3 0.0 1 1 0
2018 8.5 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Chesterfield

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 74 employers in Chesterfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Batesville Tool & Die Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Die, Tool & Machine 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakwood Metal Fabricating 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineering Specialties, Inc. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smart Vision Lights 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7855 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse County Road Commission 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metropolitan Concrete Corp. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2692 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motor City Stamping, Inc. 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2692 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) 253 FTE
NAT-TCR Baptist Health Extended Care Hospital 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR C511 Leland 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Fire Equipment Inc - AZ 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Logan plant 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Houston Distribution 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traffic Safety Service LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Perkins Facility 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit Rail Support Facility 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.