Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Minnesota

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility

Minneapolis, MN · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility: 6.4 TCR = 142% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility safety composite

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility: 1.8 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 15.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility's TCR rose 3.8 from 1.8 in 2018 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 142% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #10/18
  • PHOTO 55355 Visalia
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 55355 Visalia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Transit Rail Support Facility averages 6.4 TCR (142% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=15.5 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Metro Transit Rail Support Facility falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 18 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Minnesota.

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility (59 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Transit Rail Support Facility
Metro Transit Rail Support Facility (59 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Metro Transit Rail Support Facility has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 3 0 0
2023 7.9 7.9 4 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2021 15.5 13.8 8 1 0
2020 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2019 6.7 6.7 4 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MN · Minneapolis

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 55355 Visalia 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Diego Trolley, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charleston Base, South Base, North Base and Harborside 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grays Harbor Transportation 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDR Technologies, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7580 Commerce Lane NE, Fridley, MN 55432 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advantage Seamless, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauk Rapids, MN (All State) 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Casteel Heating and Cooling - West 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Toyota Ky Cafe 200 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Maloney Properties, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-UT-Draper Salt Lake City-313 West 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burley Clay Products Company 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Houston Distribution 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaller Corporation Plant 6 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traffic Safety Service LLC 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.