Fire sprinkler system installation · California

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc.

San Diego, CA · ~71 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 141% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. safety composite

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc.: 1.4 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 1.4 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 141% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #305/594
  • PHOTO Haynes Heating & Coo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Haynes Heating & Cooling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (141% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.8

Where Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #305 safest of 594 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in California.

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. (71 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc.
Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. (71 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Schmidt Fire Protection Co., Inc. has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 12.3 5.4 8 1 0
2021 6.4 6.4 2 3 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · San Diego

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Haynes Heating & Cooling 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Fighter Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Raleigh 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paschal Air Plumbing and Electric - NWA 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Pineda Farming Co 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE AgSource Services, LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schafer Ranch, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & J Dondero Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Products Distributors, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 052 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Flex-N-Gate Alabama, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 754 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE AeroSpec Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Aviation - LAS 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sagola Hardwoods Ltd 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE AJ Kent Care Center OPCO LLC 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.