Aluminum siding installation · Minnesota

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc

Mankato, MN · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc runs at 549% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aluminum siding installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc: 15.4 TCR = 549% of Aluminum siding installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc safety composite

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2018→2024

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc injury rate improved

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc's TCR fell 11.1 from 23.9 in 2018 to 12.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=23.9 · 2019=22.7 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=12.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238170 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 549% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO LeafGuard of Seattle
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LeafGuard of Seattle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc averages 15.4 TCR (549% of the Aluminum siding installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc TCR series: 2018=23.9 · 2019=22.7 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc falls in its industry

137 Aluminum siding installation establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Aluminum siding installation employers in Minnesota.

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc (56 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc
Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc (56 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 35 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Schmidt Siding and Window, Inc has more employees than the Aluminum siding installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 5.5 7 0 0
2023 7.3 3.7 4 0 0
2022 14.8 10.5 7 0 0
2021 10.7 1.8 6 0 0
2019 22.7 12.4 11 0 0
2018 23.9 19.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238170 · MN · Mankato

137 Aluminum siding installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LeafGuard of Seattle 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Products Inc 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peoria Siding & Window Co 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exterior Finishes, LLC 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LDC.FAR 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shakopee Public Utilities 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Mankato 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR 37 - North Little Rock 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sante Restoration LLC 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Newport 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0662 Washington 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dave Spurr Excavating, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marrs Electric LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayetteville NC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg Women's & Pediatric Health Services 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.