Computer systems integration design consulting services · Georgia

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta

Alpharetta, GA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Computer systems integration design consulting services workplace, earning a grade C.

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Computer systems integration design consulting services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta safety composite

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta held a steady TCR band

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Alpharetta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/8
  • PHOTO Hopkinton 228
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hopkinton 228 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Computer systems integration design consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta falls in its industry

181 Computer systems integration d establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 Computer systems integration d employers in Georgia.

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta
Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Schneider Electric Systems USA, Inc - Alpharetta has fewer employees than the Computer systems integration design cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · GA · Alpharetta

181 Computer systems integration design consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hopkinton 228 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Aurora E Steamboat Ave (1666) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southboro 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin 55 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Noah's Ark Operating - 1704 Noah's Ark Rd. Jonesboro 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE RWAllen 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cope Closets Concepts 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeSoto III Solar Farm 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and r of Jefferson City LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yokohama Industries Americas Inc. Division 5 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Charlotte PNC Amphitheate 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.