Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · North Carolina

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant

Lexington, NC · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant safety composite

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant held a steady TCR band

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Lexington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/132
  • PHOTO Rogan Corporation
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rogan Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 132 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in North Carolina.

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant (57 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant
Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant (57 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schuetz Container Systems Wash Plant has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Lexington

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 120 employers in Lexington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rogan Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 26_19 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schuetz Container Systems 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tema Isenmann, Inc. 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Division 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirlin Builders 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Steel Products 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Schools 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Government 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Windows & Door 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASCO Power Technologies 639 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant 1 - Washington 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Claremore OK - Utility Fab 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Clinch River Forest Products 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Schuetz Container Systems 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Club Vacations Inc. Tahoe Ridge Resort - HOSP 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE CEDI Dallas 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Focused Care at Gilmer 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE COH Recreation- Valley View Rec Ctr 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.