Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing · Minnesota

Schweiss Distributing Inc

Hector, MN · ~55 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schweiss Distributing Inc runs at 388% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Schweiss Distributing Inc: 12.8 TCR = 388% of Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schweiss Distributing Inc safety composite

Schweiss Distributing Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2018→2024

Schweiss Distributing Inc injury rate improved

Schweiss Distributing Inc's TCR fell 6.1 from 20.3 in 2018 to 14.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=20.3 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=14.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Hector, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 388% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Manko Window Systems…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manko Window Systems, Inc. - Aurora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Schweiss Distributing Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schweiss Distributing Inc averages 12.8 TCR (388% of the Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schweiss Distributing Inc TCR series: 2018=20.3 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=14.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Schweiss Distributing Inc falls in its industry

515 Hangar doors, metal, manufactu establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Hangar doors, metal, manufactu employers in Minnesota.

Schweiss Distributing Inc (55 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Schweiss Distributing Inc
Schweiss Distributing Inc (55 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Schweiss Distributing Inc has fewer employees than the Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.2 4.7 9 0 0
2023 12.3 3.5 7 0 0
2022 14.9 1.9 8 0 0
2021 7.4 0.0 4 0 0
2020 13.1 1.9 7 0 0
2019 7.4 1.9 4 0 0
2018 20.3 9.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · MN · Hector

515 Hangar doors, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Hector, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manko Window Systems, Inc. - Aurora 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Window and Door Systems PA, LLC 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAC Acoustics a Division of Sound Seal 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OBE - Tampa SC 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Langhorst Pork, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gemko of Forest Lake dba WDI Company 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE FCO Echo 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melrose, MN (Arvig) 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loftness Specialized Farm Equipment, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNHC-CSI-MN - HECTOR 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hector High School 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUTTLE - MN - HECTOR 59 FTE
NAT-TCR American House - Grand Blanc 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomlinson Bomberger Lawn Care & Landscape, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-009-Princeton ( RK-009 ) 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DMWN - Petaluma 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WCA Construction, LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7335 Bonded PAC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Structural Wood Corporation 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX Whiskey Ranch 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.