Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished · Illinois

Scot Forge - Franklin Park

Franklin Park, IL · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scot Forge - Franklin Park runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade B.

Scot Forge - Franklin Park: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scot Forge - Franklin Park safety composite

Scot Forge - Franklin Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Scot Forge - Franklin Park held a steady TCR band

Scot Forge - Franklin Park's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.1 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Franklin Park, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #4/19
  • PHOTO Oxford Forge
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oxford Forge (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Scot Forge - Franklin Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scot Forge - Franklin Park averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scot Forge - Franklin Park TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Scot Forge - Franklin Park falls in its industry

241 Steel forgings made from purch establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 19 Steel forgings made from purch employers in Illinois.

Scot Forge - Franklin Park (42 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Scot Forge - Franklin Park
Scot Forge - Franklin Park (42 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Scot Forge - Franklin Park has fewer employees than the Steel forgings made from purchased steel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2018 7.1 5.3 4 0 0
2017 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · IL · Franklin Park

241 Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 127 employers in Franklin Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oxford Forge 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR U.S. Tsubaki Automotive, LLC - Chicopee, MA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastham Forge Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles E. Larson & Sons, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DAS Pontiac, IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-R&D 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egyptian Electric Cooperative 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR ILFRA - FRANKLIN PARK HUB 799 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRANKLIN PARK HUB (ILFRA) 740 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sloan Franklin Park 709 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hill Mechanical Corp 703 FTE
NAT-TCR Moorestown Health & Wellness Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Texas Electric Co-op - 1 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Assessor/Recorder/Cty Clk & Treasurer/Tax Collector 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Aviation - APC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cordes Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites at the Conference Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antebellum Grove Senior Living 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawthorne Gardening - Aurora 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.