Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation · Minnesota

SCR Southern

Rochester, MN · ~17 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCR Southern runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

SCR Southern: 5.8 TCR = 206% of Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCR Southern safety composite

SCR Southern scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SCR Southern held a steady TCR band

SCR Southern's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 206% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #81/153
  • PHOTO Cincinnati
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cincinnati (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

SCR Southern in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCR Southern averages 5.8 TCR (206% of the Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCR Southern TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=6 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where SCR Southern falls in its industry

5,793 Heating and ventilation system establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 153 Heating and ventilation system employers in Minnesota.

SCR Southern (17 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SCR Southern
SCR Southern (17 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

SCR Southern has fewer employees than the Heating and ventilation system component median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2021 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 17.8 0.0 3 0 0
2018 11.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MN · Rochester

5,793 Heating and ventilation system component (e.g., air registers, diffusers, filters, grilles, sound attenuators) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cincinnati 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Plumbing Heating & Cooling 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GUFP 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forrest Shoemaker Air Conditioning Inc 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MN Highway 12 003-0138-HT 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olivia - East 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hastings, MN 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cloquet 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR Haydon Corporation CA 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1180 - Greensboro Lawndale 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1943 - Wichita Maple 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rubex Inc 5.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.