Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Scranton Plant

Eynon, PA · ~174 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scranton Plant runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Scranton Plant: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scranton Plant safety composite

Scranton Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Scranton Plant injury rate improved

Scranton Plant's TCR fell 2.9 from 6.5 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336992 · Eynon, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Howe & Howe, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Howe & Howe, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Scranton Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scranton Plant averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scranton Plant TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Scranton Plant falls in its industry

49 Tanks, military (including fac establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Tanks, military (including fac employers in Pennsylvania.

Scranton Plant (174 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Scranton Plant
Scranton Plant (174 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Scranton Plant has more employees than the Tanks, military (including factory rebui median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.0 6 0 0
2023 3.9 3.4 7 0 0
2022 2.7 1.6 5 0 0
2021 4.4 3.1 10 0 0
2020 2.7 1.4 6 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.3 3.5 6 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.5 3.2 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336992 · PA · Eynon

49 Tanks, military (including factory rebuilding), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Howe & Howe, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Battelle - Hilliard Operations 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Choctaw Defense Manufacturing Contractor - McAlester 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Battelle - Hilliard Operations 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Sire Power, Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wyomissing 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE League Collegiate Wear, LLC 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCG Scranton 174 FTE
NAT-TCR MAREK Atlanta 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CHCNJ 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Halron - Green Bay 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kewaunee Fabrications 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mt. Laurel Supermarket Inc. 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnston 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Factory 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.