Computer and network cable installation · Georgia

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc.

Duluth, GA · ~174 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Computer and network cable installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Computer and network cable installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. safety composite

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc.: 0.0 → 0.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Duluth, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #61/131
  • PHOTO Robinson Electric Co…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Robinson Electric Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Computer and network cable installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.2 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Computer and network cable ins establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 131 Computer and network cable ins employers in Georgia.

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. (174 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc.
Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. (174 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Network Cabling Infrastructure Inc. has more employees than the Computer and network cable installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 2.2 1.6 4 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 4 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2019 4.4 2.9 9 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · GA · Duluth

4,550 Computer and network cable installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 203 employers in Duluth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Robinson Electric Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collins Electric Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Electric, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.L.M. Electric Co., Inc. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Estes Services 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valdosta Roll Facility 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Club Chef LLC - ATL 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Duluth 1,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boehringer Ingelheim Duluth 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR BI Vet Medica 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 123569-NORTH METRO GA P&DC 1,103 FTE
NAT-TCR Lee Adcock Construction Co., Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Heat Treating, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Flanders 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scranton Plant 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Laurel Supermarket Inc. 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnston 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at St Vincent Infirmary Med Food 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.