Wired Telecommunications Carriers · California

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company

Sacramento, CA · ~291 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Wired Telecommunications Carriers workplace, earning a grade D.

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company: 1.4 TCR = 194% of Wired Telecommunications Carriers BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company safety composite

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.68× in 2022

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 2.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.4 · 194% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #17/39
  • PHOTO BRHMALHQ
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~291 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BRHMALHQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company averages 1.4 TCR (194% of the Wired Telecommunications Carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 0.7

Where SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company falls in its industry

537 Wired Telecommunications Carri establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 39 Wired Telecommunications Carri employers in California.

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company (291 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company
SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company (291 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

SCRLCA01 - Pacific Bell Telephone Company has more employees than the Wired Telecommunications Carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.3 4 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · CA · Sacramento

537 Wired Telecommunications Carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BRHMALHQ 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starpower Communications dba RCN-Ann Arrundel 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ben Lomand Connect (Corporate) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Madison Farms LLC 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pistachio Plant 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morada Produce Co LP 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCH Shafter Office 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Bonded Services Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cresco Labs - Encanto 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellington 35300 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Grand Canyon Univ-Pita Jungle 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4518 Dublin Mill 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4028-AZ001 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0439 - Aurora Co Whse 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0390 - Middlebelt Mi Whse 291 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.