Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation · Massachusetts

SDO - Sharon

Sharon, MA · ~49 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SDO - Sharon runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation workplace, earning a grade D.

SDO - Sharon: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SDO - Sharon safety composite

SDO - Sharon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2018→2021

SDO - Sharon injury rate improved

SDO - Sharon's TCR fell 5.3 from 10.1 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.1 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Sharon, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #86/164
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DJZ6 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

SDO - Sharon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SDO - Sharon averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SDO - Sharon TCR series: 2018=10.1 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=4.8 · BLS 6.5

Where SDO - Sharon falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 164 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Massachusetts.

SDO - Sharon (49 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate SDO - Sharon
SDO - Sharon (49 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

SDO - Sharon has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2020 7.9 7.9 4 0 0
2019 10.6 10.6 4 0 0
2018 10.1 6.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MA · Sharon

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 19 employers in Sharon, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DJZ6 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DSC4 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLDEE - DEERFIELD 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMLAS - LAS CRUCES 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE G&F Precision Molding INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE TANGO CONSTRCTION, INC. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nashoba Air Inc. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Senior Metal Bellows 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAI-0033-0033-00418 FAC-00418-SHARON-MA 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-00418 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000000418 107 FTE
NAT-TCR IWT - Salisbury 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Santa Barbara 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sedano's Supermarket #21 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cana Cabinetry 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spanaway WA Yard 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Rebar Nufab - Birmingham Alabama 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sto Corp 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE LSNE-Madison, LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.