Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation · Massachusetts

SDO - Stoneham

Stoneham, MA · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SDO - Stoneham runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation workplace, earning a grade B.

SDO - Stoneham: 5.0 TCR = 77% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SDO - Stoneham safety composite

SDO - Stoneham scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2018→2021

SDO - Stoneham injury rate improved

SDO - Stoneham's TCR fell 4.2 from 6.6 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Stoneham, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #29/164
  • PHOTO FedEx 3055 PORTIA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 3055 PORTIA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

SDO - Stoneham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SDO - Stoneham averages 5.0 TCR (77% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SDO - Stoneham TCR series: 2018=6.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 6.5

Where SDO - Stoneham falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 164 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Massachusetts.

SDO - Stoneham (81 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate SDO - Stoneham
SDO - Stoneham (81 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

SDO - Stoneham has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2020 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 4 0 0
2018 6.6 5.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MA · Stoneham

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 20 employers in Stoneham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3055 PORTIA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 840 LAKESIDE DR 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warp Drive Logistics LLC. 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 100360016 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MATEP 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Auburn 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fuse Specialty 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-MA-Raynham-John Hancock 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Care Center of Stoneham 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100039 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100039 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2532-25320050 136 FTE
NAT-TCR GLS Group Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sand Hills 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lonesome Dove Concrete Pumping LLC Belgrade 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Curran Contracting Co - Texas Division 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Gypsum Norfolk 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bender Plumbing Supplies New Haven 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruan Transport Corporation T-391 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE 42967 - Oak Forest Fac 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.