Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Michigan

Warp Drive Logistics LLC.

Walker, MI · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Warp Drive Logistics LLC.: 5.0 TCR = 77% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. safety composite

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Warp Drive Logistics LLC.: 0.0 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Warp Drive Logistics LLC.'s TCR rose 10.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 10.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Walker, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #49/202
  • PHOTO FedEx 3055 PORTIA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 3055 PORTIA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warp Drive Logistics LLC. averages 5.0 TCR (77% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=10 · BLS 6.5

Where Warp Drive Logistics LLC. falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 202 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Michigan.

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. (38 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Warp Drive Logistics LLC.
Warp Drive Logistics LLC. (38 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Warp Drive Logistics LLC. has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 10.0 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MI · Walker

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 67 employers in Walker, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3055 PORTIA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 840 LAKESIDE DR 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SDO - Stoneham 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 100360016 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DGR1 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHI Bissell Homecare Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walker Stamping & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 1) 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Contract Manufacturing Grand Rapids 465 FTE
NAT-TCR Marin General Hospital Corp 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakland Nursery - Columbus 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd/PTG Management Co. - Palmetto Location 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OakLeaf Surgical Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Austin 9320 Rental Car Ln 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Depin Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE WLS Fabricating 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nibrock, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.