Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shearing strength, tensile strength, torsion) manufacturing · Washington

Seattle Safety

Name: Seattle Safety Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Auburn, WA · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seattle Safety runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shearing strength, tensile strength, torsion) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Seattle Safety: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shearing strength, tensile strength, torsion) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seattle Safety safety composite

Seattle Safety scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2023

Seattle Safety injury rate improved

Seattle Safety's TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Auburn, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #7/7
PHOTO Kahn Industries, Inc.
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kahn Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Tel-Tru Manufa

2.6
Gatekeeper

2.6
This site

2.5
Kahn Industrie

2.5
Enterprise Ele

2.3

What this shows Seattle Safety averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shearing strength, tensile strength, torsion) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Seattle Safety TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Seattle Safety falls in its industry

128 Testing equipment (e.g., abras establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Testing equipment (e.g., abras employers in Washington.

Seattle Safety (48 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Seattle Safety has fewer employees than the Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shear median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2019	4.4	4.4	2
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2016	5.6	0.0	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · WA · Auburn

128 Testing equipment (e.g., abrasion, shearing strength, tensile strength, torsion) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 166 employers in Auburn, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Kahn Industries, Inc.	WETHERSFIELD, CT	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Tel-Tru Manufacturing	ROCHESTER, NY	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Gatekeeper	STERLING, VA	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Enterprise Electronics Corporation	ENTERPRISE, AL	2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Cold Creek Vineyards #8	WOODINVILLE, WA	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	F/T Constellation	SEATTLE	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	F/T Defender	SEATTLE	48 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Esperanza Ridge LLC	EAST WENATCHEE	48 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WA001	Auburn	4,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Zones, LLC	Auburn	1,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Muckleshoot Casino	Auburn	1,616 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Muckleshoot Indian Tribe	Auburn	1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR	W.L. French Excavating Corp	North Billerica, MA	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	University Subaru Inc	Columbia, MO	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	NeCo Seed Farms, Inc	Garden City, MO	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cabinetworks Group	Duncanville, TX	2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Innovative Wall Systems Inc. DBA Alta Drywall	Escondido, CA	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Laborde Products, Inc.	Covington, LA	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	AAA Mine Service, Inc.	Hazard, KY	48 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Stepan Company Columbus	Columbus, GA	48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.