Skilled Nursing Facility · California

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

Eureka, CA · ~80 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade C.

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center: 5.2 TCR = 80% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center safety composite

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2018→2024

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center injury rate improved

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center's TCR fell 9.0 from 10.5 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Eureka, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 80% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #177/739
  • PHOTO Tithonus Greensburg
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tithonus Greensburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center averages 5.2 TCR (80% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center TCR series: 2018=10.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 739 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in California.

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center (80 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center
Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center (80 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Seaview Rehabilitation and Wellness Center has fewer employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.9 4.0 4 0 0
2021 10.2 10.2 5 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 10.5 7.8 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Eureka

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Eureka, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tithonus Greensburg 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4459 Bailey Avenue Operating Company, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victoria Post Acute Care 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Presbyterian Homes 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 65 1,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA814 ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL EUREKA HR 1,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001430 1,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 407 701 FTE
NAT-TCR Williston Retail 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Concord 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CHRISTUS Santa Rosa New Braunfels 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Camden Metal Company 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE RVI-Harmony 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSM Cook 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott and Sons Construction and Mechanical Services Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Toyota Lone Star Commons 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.