Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Ohio

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.

Uniontown, OH · ~1,258 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade C.

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 105% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. safety composite

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Uniontown, OH ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Integrated Fire Syst…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~1,258 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Integrated Fire Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (105% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 2.6

Where Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Ohio.

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. (1,258 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Securitas Electronic Security, Inc.
Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. (1,258 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 1.7 41 0 0
2016 2.8 1.2 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · OH · Uniontown

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 37 employers in Uniontown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Integrated Fire Systems 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPI Security Raleigh Division 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Group 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAFR-90-FREMONT, CA 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ahuja Medical Center 1,258 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northwest Local School District 1,259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockwell Automation- Mayfield Heights OH (MAY) 1,261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mercy Health Home Office 1,255 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Custom Critical, Inc. 681 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Wellness Green 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #1620 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Navistar Direct marketing 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CN - Brandywine Valley Specialty Care and Surgery Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 3208 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PPOSBC - San Bernardino 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 355311-Mid-Island Ny P&Dc 1,258 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medtronic Diabetes Commercial 1,258 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dsd1 1,257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.