Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · New York

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp

Lancaster, NY · ~65 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp safety composite

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp held a steady TCR band

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.4 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.4 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Lancaster, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #10/46
  • PHOTO New Millennium Build…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp TCR series: 2021=1.4 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 46 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in New York.

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp (65 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp
Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp (65 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Seibel Modern Mfg & Welding Corp has more employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NY · Lancaster

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Salem 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR W&W|AFCO Steel Montgomery 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmer Steel 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DME Manufacturing PA INC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pearl Creek Management, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE John B Martin & Sons Farms, Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrell Dairy, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Hornell 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Harrell's Coatings Solutions 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tailored Chemical Products, Inc. - Plant 2 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Matthews Feed & Grain, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Gables of Canton 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Worldpak Flexible Packaging 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Biggs, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. Rifkin Co 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Metal Works, LLC 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.