Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · Nevada

Worldpak Flexible Packaging

Reno, NV · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Worldpak Flexible Packaging runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Worldpak Flexible Packaging: 7.9 TCR = 240% of Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Worldpak Flexible Packaging safety composite

Worldpak Flexible Packaging scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

Worldpak Flexible Packaging injury rate improved

Worldpak Flexible Packaging's TCR fell 5.4 from 7.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12264.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=11.3 · 2019=15.1 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=12264.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Reno, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 240% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO RUTAN POLY INDUSTRIES
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RUTAN POLY INDUSTRIES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Worldpak Flexible Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Worldpak Flexible Packaging averages 7.9 TCR (240% of the Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Worldpak Flexible Packaging TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=11.3 · 2019=15.1 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=12264.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Worldpak Flexible Packaging falls in its industry

322 Bags, plastics film, single wa establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Bags, plastics film, single wa employers in Nevada.

Worldpak Flexible Packaging (65 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Worldpak Flexible Packaging
Worldpak Flexible Packaging (65 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Worldpak Flexible Packaging has fewer employees than the Bags, plastics film, single wall or mult median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2021 12264.1 11320.8 13 0 0
2020 9.9 9.9 9 0 0
2019 15.1 10.6 10 0 0
2017 11.3 7.0 6 2 0
2016 7.2 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · NV · Reno

322 Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RUTAN POLY INDUSTRIES 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAC Machinery Bags & Materials 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waverly Plastics 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NS Flexibles LLC dba St Johns Packaging 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tripp Enterprises Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Momeni Construction, INC. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSW Framing 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frehner Masonry 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR MMC- Eau Claire 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nipro Group 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Electric, LLC - Columbus Branch 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo King of Springfield 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Metal Works, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE CBI Fort Lauderdale 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. Colarusso and Son, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milpitas - Uniclean - 050 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.