Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing · Delaware

Selbyville Processing

Selbyville, DE · ~2,026 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Selbyville Processing runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing workplace, earning a grade C.

Selbyville Processing: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Selbyville Processing safety composite

Selbyville Processing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Selbyville Processing held a steady TCR band

Selbyville Processing's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.5 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Selbyville, DE AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Peco Foods Inc.-Poul…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 439 inj
  • SIZE ~2,026 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peco Foods Inc.-Poultry Processing Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Delaware employers → · Look up another →

Selbyville Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Selbyville Processing averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Selbyville Processing TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Selbyville Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry slaughtering, dressing establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Delaware alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Poultry slaughtering, dressing employers in Delaware.

Selbyville Processing (2,026 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Selbyville Processing
Selbyville Processing (2,026 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Selbyville Processing has more employees than the Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and pack median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.6 43 12 0
2023 2.9 2.2 52 12 0
2022 4.2 2.0 65 26 0
2021 3.3 1.6 40 33 0
2020 3.0 1.8 42 23 0
2019 2.4 1.5 42 20 0
2018 2.6 2.1 42 17 0
2017 2.2 1.9 54 12 0
2016 2.5 2.3 59 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · DE · Selbyville

509 Poultry slaughtering, dressing, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,487 rated employers in Delaware with headcount on file · 7 employers in Selbyville, DE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peco Foods Inc.-Poultry Processing Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Filet of Chicken 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fieldale Farms - Murrayville Plant 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. 1,841 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millsboro Processing 2,261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beebe Healthcare 2,465 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbeson DE Processing Facility 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6921-00327 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02123 - STORE # 2123 SELBYVILLE 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01206 - STORE # 1206 SELBYVILLE 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2123 65 FTE
NAT-TCR LaGrange - Main 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tomahawk Construction - US 41 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0010 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brilex Industries, Inc. P1 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orlando 2,027 FTE
NAT-SIZE King County Public Health 2,027 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-MIDET210 2,027 FTE
NAT-SIZE Planet Hollywood Las Vegas Resort & Casino 2,025 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.