Chickens, slaughtering and dressing · Mississippi

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant

Bay Springs, MS · ~641 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Chickens, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade C.

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant safety composite

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant: 2.7 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2019

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant's TCR rose 0.8 from 2.7 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Bay Springs, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #16/41
  • PHOTO Peco Foods Inc.-Poul…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~641 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peco Foods Inc.-Poultry Processing Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dre establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 41 Chickens, slaughtering and dre employers in Mississippi.

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant (641 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant
Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant (641 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Bay Springs, MS Processing Plant has more employees than the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 2.1 22 3 0
2018 2.6 2.2 18 0 0
2017 2.5 1.3 17 0 0
2016 2.7 1.6 16 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Bay Springs

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bay Springs, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peco Foods Inc.-Poultry Processing Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Selbyville Processing 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Filet of Chicken 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fieldale Farms - Murrayville Plant 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company 633 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6768-67680052-MSDC 650 FTE
STATE-SIZE King's Daughters Medical Center 651 FTE
STATE-SIZE PECO Foods West Point 630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Foods Inc. (Bay Springs Plant) 746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Springs Processing Facility 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hol-Mac Corporation Plant 3 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMC P-2 213 FTE
NAT-TCR DH Pace Door Services - Special Markets 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FL305A 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet Sinai Grace Hospital Evs 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ArcelorMittal Riverdale 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : North Hatfield, MA (PDC) 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Procter & Gamble Paper Products 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Besse 641 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 1620 Hermosa Ave #64 641 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.