Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · California

Select Mechanical Inc

Livermore, CA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Select Mechanical Inc runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Select Mechanical Inc: 9.8 TCR = 350% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Select Mechanical Inc safety composite

Select Mechanical Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Select Mechanical Inc: 0.0 → 31.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 31.3 TCR · DART/TCR 3.2× in 2024

Select Mechanical Inc's TCR rose 31.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 31.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 350% of ind

  • DART 31.3 DART
  • RANK #506/594
  • PHOTO MTBM, LLC D/B/A MTB …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MTBM, LLC D/B/A MTB Mechanical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Select Mechanical Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Select Mechanical Inc averages 9.8 TCR (350% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Select Mechanical Inc TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=20.4 · 2024=31.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Select Mechanical Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #506 safest of 594 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in California.

Select Mechanical Inc (23 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Select Mechanical Inc
Select Mechanical Inc (23 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Select Mechanical Inc has fewer employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.3 31.3 2 2 0
2023 20.4 13.6 3 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Livermore

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MTBM, LLC D/B/A MTB Mechanical 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RHD Plumbing, Inc 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huft Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pleune Construction Division 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Waterloo 144 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Diggerland West Berlin NJ 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Morristown Iron and Metal 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR E Colonial 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cambria Surfaces Plymouth 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leppert-Nutmeg, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03694 - American Landfill 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.