Doors and door frames, plastics, manufacturing · Oregon

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility

Redmond, OR · ~83 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Doors and door frames, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility: 8.1 TCR = 246% of Doors and door frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility safety composite

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2017

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility injury rate improved

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility's TCR fell 7.2 from 11.7 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.7 · 2017=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Redmond, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 246% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #25/29
  • PHOTO Chem-Tainer - Compton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chem-Tainer - Compton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility averages 8.1 TCR (246% of the Doors and door frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2017=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility falls in its industry

2,838 Doors and door frames, plastic establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 29 Doors and door frames, plastic employers in Oregon.

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility (83 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility
Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility (83 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Senneca Holdings - Redmond facility has fewer employees than the Doors and door frames, plastics, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.5 1.1 4 0 0
2016 11.7 11.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OR · Redmond

2,838 Doors and door frames, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 90 employers in Redmond, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chem-Tainer - Compton 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln- Plant 2 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLI Pool Products Sinter Court 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR P70 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Portland 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSK11 - North Sky - Sherwood 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oregon Fruit Products LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0045-0045-08404 FAC-08404-CLACKAMAS-OR 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond School District 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR BasX Solutions 483 FTE
NAT-TCR Assisted Transportation Services - Kansas City 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office, Maintenance , Camp, Non Medical Transportation 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Deans Electric Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shady Maple Smorgasbord 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coast to Coast Logistics LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hc42-442-Westchester Care Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPP Timber & Lumber 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sylvania Center 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.