Senior citizens' homes without nursing care · Michigan

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community

Grand Rapids, MI · ~57 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens' homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community: 7.5 TCR = 197% of Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community safety composite

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community: 6.0 → 18.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community's TCR rose 12.5 from 6.0 in 2016 to 18.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 197% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #118/201
  • PHOTO Brookdale Tanglewood…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Tanglewood Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community averages 7.5 TCR (197% of the Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community falls in its industry

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 201 Senior citizens' homes without employers in Michigan.

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community (57 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community
Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community (57 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community has more employees than the Senior citizens' homes without nursing c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 3.1 5 1 0
2023 13.3 3.3 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 1 1 0
2020 11.9 0.0 3 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Grand Rapids

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tanglewood Oaks 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clark Crossings of Wells 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bethesda North Pointe 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WILLOWS WHITNEY PLACE MEDWAY 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomingdale MI Facility 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville SC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dickinson Homes 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concraft Inc 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR 006 Plaza del Caribe 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sellenriek Construction Jonesburg 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Resdoor 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Therm-O-Link of Texas 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Compressed Steel 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Forest Products, Inc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elizabeth Shutters, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carpin Manufacturing Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.