Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber · California

Unity Forest Products, Inc

Yuba City, CA · ~57 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Unity Forest Products, Inc runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade F.

Unity Forest Products, Inc: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Unity Forest Products, Inc safety composite

Unity Forest Products, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2016→2024

Unity Forest Products, Inc injury rate improved

Unity Forest Products, Inc's TCR fell 12.9 from 21.6 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.6 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=10.5 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Yuba City, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Western Valley Cutst…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Valley Cutstock, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Unity Forest Products, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Unity Forest Products, Inc averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Unity Forest Products, Inc TCR series: 2016=21.6 · 2017=7.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=10.5 · 2022=10 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Unity Forest Products, Inc falls in its industry

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchas establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Boards, wood, resawing purchas employers in California.

Unity Forest Products, Inc (57 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Unity Forest Products, Inc
Unity Forest Products, Inc (57 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Unity Forest Products, Inc has more employees than the Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 7.2 5 1 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 10.0 8.6 4 3 0
2021 10.5 3.5 3 3 0
2020 5.9 0.0 3 0 0
2019 5.5 1.8 3 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2017 7.6 0.0 2 2 0
2016 21.6 14.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · CA · Yuba City

178 Boards, wood, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 123 employers in Yuba City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Valley Cutstock, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creedmoor Forest Products, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hughes Hardwood International Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Earl 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuba City Unified School District 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunsweet Growers 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR RMZ Farm Labor Services 609 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1903 462 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DOB2 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Black Hawk County Secondary Roads 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Raleigh- Transportation 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Ocean Medical Center 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Compressed Steel 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sentinel Pointe Retirement Community 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC 97 - Montgomery 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC 43 - Armonk 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.