Continuing care retirement communities · California

Sequoia Living

San Francisco, CA · ~103 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sequoia Living runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade A.

Sequoia Living: 1.4 TCR = 38% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sequoia Living safety composite

Sequoia Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2021→2024

Sequoia Living injury rate improved

Sequoia Living's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/216
  • PHOTO Oxford Grand McKinne…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oxford Grand McKinney, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sequoia Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sequoia Living averages 1.4 TCR (38% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sequoia Living TCR series: 2021=4.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Sequoia Living falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Sequoia Living (103 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sequoia Living
Sequoia Living (103 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Sequoia Living has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Francisco

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oxford Grand McKinney, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southfield Village 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASHLEY PLACE 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE T&A Onions - Huron - Harvest 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macdoel Fields 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexandra Dates Inc 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE DiMare Company 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Mojave Electric 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Electric Construction Company 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Perretta Graphics Corp. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jabezco Industrial Group, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joslin Hides 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Phoenix 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jade Drug Company 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sangaree Elementary School 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.