Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing · Illinois

Serac Inc.

Carol Stream, IL · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Serac Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Serac Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Serac Inc. safety composite

Serac Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2024

Serac Inc. injury rate improved

Serac Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 6.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Carol Stream, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/33
  • PHOTO K-Ter Imagineering, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K-Ter Imagineering, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Serac Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Serac Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Serac Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Serac Inc. falls in its industry

269 Bottling machinery (e.g., capp establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 33 Bottling machinery (e.g., capp employers in Illinois.

Serac Inc. (79 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Serac Inc.
Serac Inc. (79 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Serac Inc. has more employees than the Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filli median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2016 6.3 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · IL · Carol Stream

269 Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 170 employers in Carol Stream, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K-Ter Imagineering, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panther Industries LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLS Automation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR R+D Custom Automation 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NG Crestwood Reporting Center 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodmark ,LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calumet City Plumbing Company and Heating 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village of Niles Public Works 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group 2,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Litho, Inc. 1,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 161275-CAROL STREAM IL P&DC 960 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods - Carol Stream 853 FTE
NAT-TCR SODEXO AT HOBART and WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGE 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Adams Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisiana Concrete Pumpers LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Orchard Park at Southfork 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ICOM Mechanical, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 294 - Ft Myers 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garrety Glass 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swift Industrial Power 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.