Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers · Tennessee

Swift Industrial Power

Knoxville, TN · ~79 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Swift Industrial Power runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Swift Industrial Power: 1.6 TCR = 71% of Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Swift Industrial Power safety composite

Swift Industrial Power scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Swift Industrial Power held a steady TCR band

Swift Industrial Power's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Knoxville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO John Day Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John Day Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Swift Industrial Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Swift Industrial Power averages 1.6 TCR (71% of the Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Swift Industrial Power TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.8 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Swift Industrial Power falls in its industry

911 Industrial machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Industrial machinery and equip employers in Tennessee.

Swift Industrial Power (79 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Swift Industrial Power
Swift Industrial Power (79 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Swift Industrial Power has more employees than the Industrial machinery and equipment (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · TN · Knoxville

911 Industrial machinery and equipment (except electrical) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 747 employers in Knoxville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John Day Company 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matsui America HQ 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR JF Acquisitions, LLC d/b/a JF Petroleum Group: Webster, MA 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gartner Equipment Co. Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE GP Cleanout (Loretto) 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corporation (Franklin) 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walker General Contractors 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaine Construction Corporation Corporate 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cellular Sales Services Group LLC 6,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Functional Pathways of TN LLC 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services K-12 2,157 FTE
NAT-TCR Ohio Valley Integration Services, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NG Resources 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SME Steel California Field 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DH Pace Company Inc dba Overhead Door Company of Central Arizona 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garrety Glass 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trailstar International Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 294 - Ft Myers 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georgia Manor Nursing Home 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.