Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · California

Service Connection - 1015

Ontario, CA · ~118 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Service Connection - 1015 runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

Service Connection - 1015: 5.3 TCR = 91% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Service Connection - 1015 safety composite

Service Connection - 1015 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

Service Connection - 1015 injury rate improved

Service Connection - 1015's TCR fell 4.8 from 5.7 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #714/1131
  • PHOTO Dover
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dover (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Service Connection - 1015 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Service Connection - 1015 averages 5.3 TCR (91% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Service Connection - 1015 TCR series: 2018=5.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Service Connection - 1015 falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #714 safest of 1131 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in California.

Service Connection - 1015 (118 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Service Connection - 1015
Service Connection - 1015 (118 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Service Connection - 1015 has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 5.6 2.4 6 1 0
2021 9.1 4.1 9 0 0
2020 10.8 7.2 9 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2018 5.7 1.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Ontario

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dover 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bargreen Ellingson Distribution Center Fife 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00018W ANDERSON 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABS-0017-0016-06501 FAC-06501-TOLLESON-AZ 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prestige Farming inc 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cipponeri Orchards 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHC Facilities, Inc. dba The Plug DTLA 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plug Connection - Lodi 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Builder Design Center - AZ 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bill Doran LLC - Omaha 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Trumbull 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC Healthcare North Augusta 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HMC Service Company 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1031 - Bay City 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE David Eschbach Jr. Inc 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health Medical Center - Heber Springs 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.