Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing · Michigan

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South

Dearborn, MI · ~136 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South safety composite

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South injury rate improved

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Dearborn, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/14
  • PHOTO ID Technology-York
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ID Technology-York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South falls in its industry

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 14 Testing, weighing, inspecting, employers in Michigan.

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South (136 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South
Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South (136 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Services to Enhance Potential Dearborn South has more employees than the Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.8 0.0 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · MI · Dearborn

269 Testing, weighing, inspecting, packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 130 employers in Dearborn, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ID Technology-York 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Change Parts, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KHS USA, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barry Wehmiller Packaging Systems 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FEBCON Inc. 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Applegate, Inc. 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.L. Bondy Insulation 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER TRUCK 20,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dearborn Truck Plant 5,037 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-1 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR PDC - PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CENTER DESIGN 3,940 FTE
NAT-TCR Conneaut Medical Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR College Square 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American & Efird Gastonia Plant 20 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mavid Construction Services 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado Springs (54) 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Chicago 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAZ-Tempe Operations Center 0042-FAC31 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0144 Portland 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.