Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) contractors · Tennessee

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC

Oak Ridge, TN · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC safety composite

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2019→2022

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC injury rate improved

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Oak Ridge, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Blackburn Constructi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blackburn Construction, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC TCR series: 2019=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC falls in its industry

809 Pipe lining (except thermal in establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Pipe lining (except thermal in employers in Tennessee.

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC (60 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC
SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC (60 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

SES Construction and Fuel Services LLC has fewer employees than the Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · TN · Oak Ridge

809 Pipe lining (except thermal insulating) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 107 employers in Oak Ridge, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blackburn Construction, INC. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tacoma LNG- CBI Services, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RLA Investments Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Appellation Pre-Fab, LLC. 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MCMINNVILLE OFFICE 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Tennessee Public Utility District 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE RSS - Nashville Roofing & Sheet Metal 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Best Choice Roofing Southeast LLC 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR UCOR 1,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) EPC Work) 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uranium Processng Facility (UPF) (EPC Work) 1,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1969-MMC1 1,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly #564 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4198 Ontario Box Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryten Lampeter LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CORPORATE INTEGRIS Health 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iga #440 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gladieux Metals Recycling 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kemtron Technologies LLC DBA Elgin Separation Solutions - Industrials 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.