Electric Power Distribution · Florida

Seven Springs Complex

New Port Richey, FL · ~107 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seven Springs Complex runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade A.

Seven Springs Complex: 0.1 TCR = 10% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seven Springs Complex safety composite

Seven Springs Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Seven Springs Complex held a steady TCR band

Seven Springs Complex's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · New Port Richey, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/135
  • PHOTO Operations Support C…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Operations Support Center (Columbia) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Seven Springs Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seven Springs Complex averages 0.1 TCR (10% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seven Springs Complex TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Seven Springs Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 135 Electric Power Distribution employers in Florida.

Seven Springs Complex (107 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Seven Springs Complex
Seven Springs Complex (107 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Seven Springs Complex has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · New Port Richey

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 75 employers in New Port Richey, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Operations Support Center (Columbia) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SYRACUSE-NY79 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AEP Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gas GC Yard 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJ Loxahatche Warehouse 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Florida Enterprises, Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE KGPCo Services, LLC dba Circet USA - Orlando 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 859 Orlando 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morton Plant North Bay Hospital (2103) 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR BayCare Behavioral Health (2610) 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pall Aeropower 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 994 474 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries LLC - Husky Superior Refinery - WI 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Schindler US HQ 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Welding and Turnarounds, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Isle Shipyard, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Durham Operations Center 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asheville Operations Center 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockwell Collins Optronics Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gervais Elementary School 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.