Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Texas

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine

Grapevine, TX · ~106 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine: 3.1 TCR = 91% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine safety composite

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2021

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine injury rate improved

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Grapevine, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #157/258
  • PHOTO Hastings Chrysler Ce…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine averages 3.1 TCR (91% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 258 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Texas.

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine (106 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine
Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine (106 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.6 1.9 4 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 6 0 0
2019 3.3 0.7 5 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 4 0 0
2017 2.0 0.5 4 0 0
2016 4.4 1.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · TX · Grapevine

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 145 employers in Grapevine, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUBARU OF MISSOULA 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freysinger Mazda 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Auto Center, Inc. DBA Jay Malone Motors 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas (TGM) 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Ft Bend 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Katy Electric Service Center 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE BMWC Constructors Gulf Coast, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Texan 1,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Grapevine 1,225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR PioneerRx Pharmacy Software-Grapevine 695 FTE
NAT-TCR Northside Hospital Forsyth 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unity Family Health Care - St Gabriel's P 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (195-115) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coats & Clark 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE A&A Transfer, LLC 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Agnes Home Health and Hospice 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelly's Foods Winter Garden 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.