Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters

St. Paul, MN · ~141 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade C.

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters: 3.1 TCR = 97% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters safety composite

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters held a steady TCR band

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.0 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 97% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #20/45
  • PHOTO Exposition Center Ma…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Exposition Center Maintenenace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters averages 3.1 TCR (97% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=4.3 · BLS 3.2

Where EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 45 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters (141 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters
EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters (141 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

EI102 - Metro Region Headquarters has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.3 3.4 4 1 0
2020 3.1 2.4 1 3 0
2019 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2018 3.0 1.5 2 2 0
2017 4.0 1.3 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · St. Paul

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Exposition Center Maintenenace 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks and Recreation 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR R29JG - Sauk Rapids Office 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk Grove Park District 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Evergreen MNF2 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wieser Brothers General Contractor, Inc. 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riley Bros Construction Inc 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Companies, Inc. 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (195-115) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sewell Cadillac of Grapevine 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Northside Hospital Forsyth 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay-Star Insulation of Dallas 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Graham Construction Company, Inc. 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Transportation, Inc.- AZ 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE ProHealth Home Care and Angle's Grace Hospice 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paragon Films Inc. Broken Arrow 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.