Asphalt roof shingle installation · Florida

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing

North Port, FL · ~92 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Asphalt roof shingle installation workplace, earning a grade F.

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing: 5.7 TCR = 205% of Asphalt roof shingle installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing safety composite

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing: 5.6 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2022

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing's TCR rose 1.0 from 5.6 in 2020 to 6.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · North Port, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 205% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #168/251
  • PHOTO Fidelity Roof Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fidelity Roof Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing averages 5.7 TCR (205% of the Asphalt roof shingle installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing TCR series: 2020=5.6 · 2021=5 · 2022=6.6 · BLS 2.8

Where SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing falls in its industry

1,723 Asphalt roof shingle installat establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 251 Asphalt roof shingle installat employers in Florida.

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing (92 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing
SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing (92 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

SGK Enterprises, Inc. dba Mark Kaufman Roofing has more employees than the Asphalt roof shingle installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.6 5.2 9 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 4 0 0
2020 5.6 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · FL · North Port

1,723 Asphalt roof shingle installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 35 employers in North Port, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fidelity Roof Company 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN COATINGS, INC. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roof Check INC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecta America WeatherGuard 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanway Farms LLC 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLASSIE GROWERS 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Technology Center South 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE W Dade Svc Cntr & Strm 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Port Social Services Office 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3387 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3387 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2727 LOWE S OF NORTH PORT FL 196 FTE
NAT-TCR Mathewson Lane 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ihop 4420 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood at Spring House Estates 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 442 - Austell 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kennedy Tank and Manufacturing Company, Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chase Hickory-Stewart Superabsorbents 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astec - Sterling 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE HHC KY Plant 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.