Community health centers and clinics, outpatient · Oregon

SH - Building M

Salem, OR · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SH - Building M runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Community health centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade B.

SH - Building M: 2.1 TCR = 56% of Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SH - Building M safety composite

SH - Building M scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

SH - Building M injury rate improved

SH - Building M's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Salem, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/22
  • PHOTO Northwestern Medicin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Centers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

SH - Building M in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SH - Building M averages 2.1 TCR (56% of the Community health centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SH - Building M TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=4 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where SH - Building M falls in its industry

599 Community health centers and c establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 22 Community health centers and c employers in Oregon.

SH - Building M (56 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SH - Building M
SH - Building M (56 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

SH - Building M has fewer employees than the Community health centers and clinics, ou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.4 1.7 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2016 3.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · OR · Salem

599 Community health centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Centers 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crossover @ SOMA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MaineGeneral Medical Center - 15 Enterprise Drive 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central MN Mental Health Center - Monticello 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherry Blossom Orchard, LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huffman and Wright logging 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPF, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doerfler Farms, Inc. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR King Fabrication L.L.C. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Strongsville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI New Oxford 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1723 North Ocean Ave 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Packing House 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Base Blvd Warehouse 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twilight Acres 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 500 Osage 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.