Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · California

Crossover @ SOMA

San Francisco, CA · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossover @ SOMA runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade B.

Crossover @ SOMA: 2.1 TCR = 56% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossover @ SOMA safety composite

Crossover @ SOMA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crossover @ SOMA: 0.0 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.01× in 2023

Crossover @ SOMA's TCR rose 8.5 from 0.0 in 2019 to 8.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 4.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 56% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #13/132
  • PHOTO SH - Building M
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SH - Building M (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crossover @ SOMA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossover @ SOMA averages 2.1 TCR (56% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossover @ SOMA TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=8.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Crossover @ SOMA falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 132 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in California.

Crossover @ SOMA (25 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossover @ SOMA
Crossover @ SOMA (25 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Crossover @ SOMA has fewer employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.5 8.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CA · San Francisco

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SH - Building M 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Centers 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central MN Mental Health Center - Monticello 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Malabar Clinic 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Sealed Air Corp Seneca 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Turbocam Calef Hwy 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Building 01 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE J.R. Filanc Construction Company, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dogwood Adult Residential Services 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLC Building Components, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.