Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Shadow Mountain Memory Care

Name: Shadow Mountain Memory Care Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Phoenix, AZ · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.5
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shadow Mountain Memory Care runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Shadow Mountain Memory Care: 2.5 TCR = 67% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shadow Mountain Memory Care safety composite

Shadow Mountain Memory Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shadow Mountain Memory Care: 0.1 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2024

Shadow Mountain Memory Care's TCR rose 4.9 from 0.1 in 2023 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 67% of ind

DART 1.7 DART
RANK #11/173
PHOTO Welcome Home Managem…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Welcome Home Management Potter Ridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.5
Welcome Home M

2.5
Southfork

2.5
EB York Assist

2.5
Wellington at

2.5

What this shows Shadow Mountain Memory Care averages 2.5 TCR (67% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Shadow Mountain Memory Care TCR series: 2023=0.1 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Shadow Mountain Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Shadow Mountain Memory Care (58 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Shadow Mountain Memory Care has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	5.0	1.7	3	0	0
2023	0.1	0.0	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Phoenix

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Welcome Home Management Potter Ridge	RED WING, MN	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Southfork	WINSTON SALEM, NC	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	EB York Assisted Living	EDINA, MN	2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Wellington at North Bend Crossing	CINCINNATI, OH	2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Redhawk Power Plant	ARLINGTON	58 FTE
STATE-SIZE	The Renaissance Companies	SCOTTSDALE	58 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DSQ	CHANDLER	58 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Diversified Interiors Arizona	PHOENIX	58 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Maricopa County	Phoenix	15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Phoenix Children's Hospital	Phoenix	7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR	All Company	Phoenix	6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6403-64030500	Phoenix	6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR	Renal Home Patient - P and F (Waukegan IL USA - P and F)	Waukegan, IL	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bellows Plumbing, Heating & Air - Santa Cruz	Soquel, CA	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	League City	League City, TX	2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mapei West Chicago	West Chicago, IL	2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Derse Las Vegas	North Las Vegas, NV	58 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bosch Rexroth Corporation - Logistics Center	Charlotte, NC	58 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Scotts Company - Chester	Chester, SC	58 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Building Center Inc - Gastonia	Gastonia, NC	58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.