Switches, electric power (except pushbotton, snap, solenoid, tumbler), manufacturing · North Carolina

Shallco Incorporated

Smithfield, NC · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shallco Incorporated runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Switches, electric power (except pushbotton, snap, solenoid, tumbler), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Shallco Incorporated: 2.8 TCR = 83% of Switches, electric power (except pushbotton, snap, solenoid, tumbler), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shallco Incorporated safety composite

Shallco Incorporated scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shallco Incorporated: 3.1 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.9× in 2023

Shallco Incorporated's TCR rose 2.1 from 3.1 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335313 · Smithfield, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO North Branford
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Branford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Shallco Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shallco Incorporated averages 2.8 TCR (83% of the Switches, electric power (except pushbotton, snap, solenoid, tumbler), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shallco Incorporated TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=6 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Shallco Incorporated falls in its industry

226 Switches, electric power (exce establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Switches, electric power (exce employers in North Carolina.

Shallco Incorporated (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Shallco Incorporated
Shallco Incorporated (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Shallco Incorporated has fewer employees than the Switches, electric power (except pushbot median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2022 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335313 · NC · Smithfield

226 Switches, electric power (except pushbotton, snap, solenoid, tumbler), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 62 employers in Smithfield, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Branford 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CANOVANAS PR 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mauell Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spang Power Electronics - PA 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnston Health 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government Complex (County Courts, Administration & Law Enforcement Buildings) 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR AAF Flanders Smithfield 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1321 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Amcor Rigid Packaging Tumwater 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J&J Cattle Co 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Masonic Retirement Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartzell Propeller Airfield 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sbn Ltl 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE WH Bagshaw Co., Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sailer's Food Market & Meat Processing Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55335 Univ of Tenn - Knoxville 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.