Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing · California

Sheathing Technologies, Inc.

Morgan Hill, CA · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sheathing Technologies, Inc.: 6.2 TCR = 189% of Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sheathing Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Sheathing Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Morgan Hill, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #57/65
  • PHOTO Sunrise Machine and …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sunrise Machine and Tool (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheathing Technologies, Inc. averages 6.2 TCR (189% of the Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=17 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Sheathing Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

555 Prosthetic appliances and supp establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 65 Prosthetic appliances and supp employers in California.

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheathing Technologies, Inc.
Sheathing Technologies, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Sheathing Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Prosthetic appliances and supplies manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 4 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 3 0 0
2021 17.0 12.4 11 0 0
2020 8.7 4.3 6 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 10.3 2.1 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · CA · Morgan Hill

555 Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 87 employers in Morgan Hill, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sunrise Machine and Tool 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWR553 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woody Springs 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Old Forge Pa DC 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunnySlope Tree Farm, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Nursery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Jager Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Demler Enterprises, LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoe Palace Corporation 2,227 FTE
CITY-NEAR Specialized Bicycle Components 600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morgan Hill Office 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mushroom Grower 400 FTE
NAT-TCR ABERDEEN 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Nevada Supply 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR El Bodegon Grocery Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ultimate Innovations, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Chita Co Ltd 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliver Travel Trailers 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graphic Service Bureau Inc 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimbrick Middleton 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.