Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Ohio

Shelly Northwest construction

Findlay, OH · ~173 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shelly Northwest construction runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Shelly Northwest construction: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shelly Northwest construction safety composite

Shelly Northwest construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Shelly Northwest construction held a steady TCR band

Shelly Northwest construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Findlay, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/141
  • PHOTO California Departmen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Department of Transportation Facility 146 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Shelly Northwest construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shelly Northwest construction averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shelly Northwest construction TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Shelly Northwest construction falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 141 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Ohio.

Shelly Northwest construction (173 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Shelly Northwest construction
Shelly Northwest construction (173 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Shelly Northwest construction has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · OH · Findlay

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 184 employers in Findlay, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 146 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 155 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 359 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 481 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weidmann Electrical Technology Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE WS Packaging Group, Inc - Mason/WSA 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArcelorMittal Warren (EIN 043634649) 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkel - Cleveland 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Findlay Campus 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whirlpool Corporation 2,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whirlpool Corporation - Findlay Operations 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blanchard Valley Hospital 1,978 FTE
NAT-TCR Zimmerbiomet Spine 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 40035 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Waskey Bridges, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Operations - Auburn Plant 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE DCB Savannah 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arista 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environment Control Colorado Springs 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE APi Group Inc. 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.